Monday, 28 November 2011
Abstracts

For one reason and another I seem to have shifted recently into a phase of painting a lot of abstracts. Ever since I took up brushes again I have produced abstract work, but I think only now I'm truly understanding why I do this...
I think there is a definite truth to the thought that keeps occurring to me, which is that when I am painting abstracts it is the most authentically 'me' as an artist that I can possibly be.
I actually really like this feeling. It's a kind of freedom. I know whatever I create, even if I'm not absolutely happy with it, it comes from somewhere very genuine and honest. There's a certain ease and grace about that.
I have always admired landscapes, and I felt for a long time that I wanted to paint them. That was a huge ambition as an artist, to become a competent landscape painter. In order to do that I began to learn this complex language of composition, mark making, colour use, depth, perspective, that allows me to make that type of work. I am a student. I work. I learn. I improve. I evolve - but it's a dance, and the landscape leads, with me following and trying to keep up.
I remember seeing my first abstracts as a child, and then later studying Kandinsky at school, and just feeling this kind of soaring, bubbling over, exploding feeling of awe, and amazement, and emotions - and belonging. As a kid you usually feel a belonging to a family, a place, a school, a band, a sport (and of course I did), but I also felt a belonging to abstract art - because those works expressed in physical form what the inside of my brain looked like. My amazement was that someone had hard wired inside *my very being* and extracted my inner languages and made them real. It's kind of like someone playing you a video recording of your imaginary friend, whom of course nobody else knows or can even see.
Of course all that is in some ways a sweeping, emotionally driven overstatement - but you know, most of it isn't... Whilst of course there cannot be one universal visual language, the language of talking in colour, form, texture, pattern, space, tempo, contrast is universal I think. I guess it's rather like saying I know a person is speaking some sort of English, it's not *my* sort of English, I'm not quite getting the dialect and the intonation, the references are a mystery to me, and they have different views, but the fact they are speaking English at all, that makes sense. I understand it without effort or conscious thought - whereas my French is a learned thing, and I can only speak and read a little, and I have to put a lot of effort into communicating that way.
In recent years I became aware of Synesthesia, which as Wikipedia puts it is...
...is a neurologically based condition in which stimulation of one sensory or cognitive pathway leads to automatic, involuntary experiences in a second sensory or cognitive pathway.Synesthetes might involuntarily connect particular colours with letters of the alphabet, or experience certain taste sensations when hearing sounds, or find sounds create various visual responses... It's something I'd really like to learn a lot more about.
To me emotions always have had certain colours and textures (these do change a little sometimes with time). Places occasionally have an association in my mind with colours or shapes. Sound and music have always been experienced in a visual way, like animations inside my mind - music is very beautiful and has shapes, colours, textures, physical movement... If I hear a lot of sound I feel quite overwhelmed and experience what I've always thought of as 'white out' in my mind, everything becomes blank and the visuals that usually play out in my mind disappear. Time I experience as a 3D space which I can move about and view from different angles depending on what data I wish to access.
My inner world speaks in texture, colour, movement, space, light and dark...
Of course what may be considered 'true synesthesia' gets a bit jumbled up with more learned ideas, like what objects or colours or shapes might be 'male' or 'female', red is stop, green is go, and no doubt some associations may have been formed by childhood experiences. Perhaps I had a book with coloured days of the week which formed all my Wednesdays into 'blue' in my minds eye, perhaps that's not real synesthesia at all? A calendar where Saturday was always marked in red? I know it's been proven that people tend to associate 'sharp' sounding words with angular shapes, etc. Never the less, it's all part of the rich tapestry of information, memory, experience and association that I draw upon when creating art.
When I create abstracts there is always a 'process'. This changes depending on the subject matter, if the painting is a commission, or for a certain project, where the inspiration is coming from. Some of how I pull together a painting does come from the inner parts of my mind, some of it is quite subconscious, but other elements of the process are quite methodical and consciously thought through.
Sometimes certain colours (sometimes those from more representational work I am working on) excite me and I feel moved to take them off, on another canvas, to somewhere more abstract. Sometimes I'm inspired by shapes, or music, or the landscape or something else in nature, events in the news... I tend to get down rough sketches, or a plan of colours I want to use - some sort of basic building blocks. From that I will make connections. So for instance if I am painting something based around the idea of 'love' I will start to make associations, some of which I guess are learned and universal - I might start jotting down colour swatches in reds and pinks, say - and others will come from somewhere less obvious - for example 'love' to me is always circles (did I get this from copying a lot of Celtic knot work I wonder, or somewhere else). Some elements of the painting will simply come from what I think makes the other elements work together, what 'finishes' the painting off.

I rarely plan a whole abstract down on paper in advance of starting painting - I've long since given up beating myself up about this (I used to feel it was very un-studious and slapdash), the truth is I can usually see a kind of 75% complete version of my original vision for the painting in my mind eye, so I kind of know where I am headed. This gives me enough to plan out the size and shape of canvas I need - which fairly often will get compromised a little according to what canvases I have in stock, I find it generally better to get onto an abstract ASAP whilst it's all fresh in my head. I usually try to make a start within three days, which often isn't a big enough window of time to get anywhere and buy a special canvas. If it's the right project though I'll wait, and in the mean time keep jotting down ideas and sketching things out to keep it as fresh as I can... My ideal is to begin right away, the moment an idea comes.
Often the finished painting has drifted away to a lesser or greater degree from the original vision I had - but that's fine, I really believe that a painting is a journey and an experience and that the process of painting can be absolutely as important as sticking rigidly to some plan or initial vision. It's nice when things evolve on the easel. There has to be some link back to the original inspiration though - or the thing has to have grown from that 'parent idea' into a child that can stand on it's own two feet. At the end of the day the painting has to look good, hang together visually, be something I feel has a sense of completeness.
When painting I always think creating an abstract is like some sort of dance. It's the dancers movements and steps on the canvas. So I am always looking at the individual elements and the tempo they have, the way they flow one to the other, and where they lead around the canvas. Individual areas of canvas have to work, like the sections of a dance, but the whole picture of where the dance started, moved to and ended has to work too. And the dancers need to have considered all areas of the dance floor. Each hand movement or step needs to have been precise and well executed, but also they need to become part of a stronger, better whole.
I have no idea really how others judge my abstracts. I have had people say they feel a real connection with certain pieces, and that is such an awesome thing! There is no doubt that when someone views an abstract work all sorts of subjective things within them comes to play. I can intend the elements or whole as something, but it's entirely up to the viewer if they agree (if they have some advance clue of what I was thinking) or have their own interpretation. I do get a huge kick out of the thought that whilst, as the artist, I explore my inner world, my views, the things that move me, that inspire me, that get me excited or make me sad, each viewer of any of my paintings goes through exactly the same process. So many truths! I'm not sure how much the art buying public gets excited about abstract painting, I feel blessed that I do sell some of this work, even through a recession, but for me abstract painting is never going to be a fully commercial activity. Whilst I'm happy to let these babies go out into the world, I could no more stop painting abstracts as I could chop off my own hand. And thank goodness for that!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)












3 comments:
These are really great!!!!
My favorite is 'Moine Thrust'. Love the split-complementary color scheme and strong contrast ... from the blue line vs the gold and orange background.
I think you'll have a more successful series of artwork if you followed stronger contrast from your subject vs your background. A lot of your art blends in (subject into background) and needs an emphasis or point of interest, which you created with 'Moine Thrust'.
(google: Rule of Thirds)
Thanks so much for taking the time to read my blog and comment, and thank you for your kind comments about ‘Moine Thrust’ - I like it too!
It’s always good to get comments on ones work - it’s such an interesting and healthy thing to hear different opinions about ones work, and to soak up viewpoints, likes, dislikes…
I found your comment about focus in my abstract compositions and needing an emphasis interesting. It prompted me to think more about what I do and why. Actually I rather think I *don’t* aim to have a very set focal point in my abstract work - well sometimes, but very often not.
Katy Moran, who’s work I much admire has said “When I’m making a painting, I get quite excited by how close to awful I can push it, while getting something quite lovely from it as well’ and whilst not quite expressing what I feel I try to do, it’s this kind of balancing act between chaos and controlled, a flat solid wall of texture and colour and gently teasing out in some subtle way a focus that I try and weigh up, subconsciously and consciously. I paint a lot of high contrast in my landscape work - and my abstract work tends to sit somewhere quite different.
I was interested in your use of the words ‘subject’ and ‘background’ as to me my abstracts don’t have these very rigid elements. The whole composition is part of the same. The subject, if you like, is expressed in terms of a kind of *total canvas saturation*. Whilst there may be a subject, it’s doesn’t necessarily exist as a firmly defined element against another area which exists only to serve in a supporting role. Just as wind blows the trees to make the leaves fly and the branches sway it also fills the space around the trees and the debris it’s moving - and I guess that’s what I try to express. It’ss quite possibly not how the universe (or abstract canvases anyway) work for other people.
Split complimentaries are wonderful, but sometimes that kind of colour scheming doesn’t suit the idea I am trying to suggest - just as the ordered, balanced nature of working around the Rule of Thirds doesn’t necessarily support an idea which to *me* is about imbalance or discord.
Of course I realise that abstract painting can be something that’s quite formulaic and mathematical, but it’s also something that’s very subjective - and to me something very intuitive. When I first started painting abstracts I searched feverishly for books that would ‘give me the rules of abstract painting’ so I could studiously follow them and ‘learn them before learning how to break them’, and I found that none of them agreed, or necessarily told me anything new. The rules, I realised, were just as much mine to invent as anyone else’s.
Ultimately - as I guess it is with any art - *success* amounts to ones own scoring against ones own set of scoring criteria.. and the intoxicating rush I feel when I finish a piece and know it ticks the little boxes inside my own head tells me I have done the best I can hope for - and that’s success enough for me. I don’t want to win over a whole art world, just my own art world.
Post a Comment